A call for genuine democracy: Addressing local government accountability in Nigeria

In recent local government elections across Nigeria, a troubling trend has emerged – ruling parties in various states have claimed all contested seats. From Delta to Kaduna, and from Lagos to Kano, the dominant parties, predominantly, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)  have swept both chairmanship and councillorship positions, leaving […]

A call for genuine democracy: Addressing local government accountability in Nigeria
A call for genuine democracy: Addressing local government accountability in Nigeria

In recent local government elections across Nigeria, a troubling trend has emerged – ruling parties in various states have claimed all contested seats. From Delta to Kaduna, and from Lagos to Kano, the dominant parties, predominantly, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)  have swept both chairmanship and councillorship positions, leaving little to no representation for opposition voices. This pattern raises critical questions about the health of Nigeria’s democracy and suggests an urgent need for transparent governance.

In a truly democratic setting, fair elections allow for opposition voices and genuine competition, ensuring a system of checks and balances. However, the recent elections in Nigeria revealed a disturbing absence of accountability, with governors reportedly handpicking local government officials to guarantee control over local finances. This selection of loyalists as councillors and chairpersons potentially enables unchecked access to local government funds, raising concerns of misappropriation and corruption.

As these officials assume office, it is imperative for Nigeria’s key anti-corruption agencies, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), to closely monitor local government funds. With allegations that certain governors are positioning allies to enable the looting of local government resources without resistance, these agencies must proactively trace these funds, investigate suspicious transactions, and confiscate illicitly acquired assets.

By keeping a close watch over local government finances, the EFCC, ICPC, and NFIU can safeguard these resources, ensuring they are used for the benefit of the people rather than diverted for personal gains. The commitment to enforce accountability and transparency at the local level would send a strong message that Nigeria’s anti-corruption bodies are willing to prosecute those who misuse public funds without fear or favour.

The current approach to local government administration is unsustainable and a disservice to the Nigerian people. When local elections lack fair competition, the public loses trust in the electoral process, and citizens feel increasingly disconnected from the system meant to represent them. This disconnection fosters a sense of powerlessness, where public officials, with unchecked authority, may prioritise personal gain over public welfare.

Moreover, the pattern of handpicked officials raises concerns about future of governance. By installing individuals loyal to personal interests rather than the community, governors may unwittingly foster an environment that tolerates corruption, delays development, and erodes the very foundation of democracy. Many of these leaders claim they are securing wealth for their children, yet the long-term effects of these actions could lead to a country where their descendants face a legacy of instability and economic hardship.

To reverse this trend, Nigeria’s leaders at all levels including the president, judiciary, legislators, and local officials must commit to higher standards of integrity. Justice, equity, and fairness are principles upon which any thriving society rests, and they are fundamental to Nigeria’s stability. Leaders should recognise that Nigeria’s future is far greater than any individual’s ambitions or interests.

For the EFCC, ICPC, and NFIU, ensuring accountability is more than a mandate, it is an investment in the nation’s future. Rigorous monitoring and enforcement can deter those who seek to exploit the system, fostering an environment where leaders prioritise service and development over self-interest.

The path forward requires leaders and institutions to put Nigeria first. Anti-corruption agencies must pursue justice, ensuring that any attempts to undermine local government funds are met with firm action. By monitoring funds and investigating cases of abuse, these agencies reinforce that Nigeria’s public resources belong to the people, not private interests.

In the end, Nigeria must be bigger than any one individual, party, or interest. Only through unity, fairness, and a commitment to transparency can the nation hope to flourish. For the sake of future generations, Nigeria’s leaders must rise to the occasion and commit to a system of governance that genuinely serves its people.

 

Iliyasu Haruna Bala wrote from Jabi, Abuja.

The men around Tinubu

Cabal should not interfere with governance – Professor Fagge

President’s men are like old wine, more experienced now – Chief Henry Ajomale

More students’ hopeful as NELFUND disbursements hit accounts