Atiku, Soyinka, Falana, others pick holes in Tinubu’s speech

Prominent citizens like former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), and a number of civil society organisations (CSOs), yesterday, faulted the national broadcast by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, saying he did not address the fundamental issues that triggered the #EndBadGovernance protest in the country. The protests, […]

Prominent citizens like former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), and a number of civil society organisations (CSOs), yesterday, faulted the national broadcast by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, saying he did not address the fundamental issues that triggered the #EndBadGovernance protest in the country. The protests, which commenced on Thursday, have claimed many lives and also resulted in the destruction of properties worth billions of naira.

 This led to calls from different quarters for President Tinubu to address Nigerians in order to douse the concerns raised by the protesters and other citizens including the cost of living crisis in the country. 

The president heeded the calls, and made a broadcast yesterday, in which he reeled out the reasons for removal of fuel subsidy and the floating of the naira, stating that these were part of necessary reforms for the growth of Nigeria. 

Tinubu also itemised some of the interventions his government had made to cushion the effects of those policies, saying Nigerians stand to benefit more in the future.

• How interest rate hike hampers borrowing in real estate
• Nigeria Youth Fund receives 200,000 applications in 2 weeks

But soon after the speech, leaders of thought and other keen observers said the president’s speech was “uninspiring,” while the protesters said he did not show any sign that he is in touch with the reality in the country. They said besides not making serious policy statements on fuel subsidy and a plan at redeeming the value of the naira, the 38-paragraph speech was completely silent on a fundamental issue – insecurity – especially in northern Nigeria, where millions of farmers have been chased away from their farms and homes.

The ongoing protest has been much more audible in the North, with protesters in Kano, Katsina, Jigawa, Sokoto, Kebbi, Zamfara, Kaduna, Yobe, Borno, Nasarawa, Adamawa, Plateau and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), showcasing placards with messages around the need to address hunger and insecurity. The protest also took place in the South West, with the exception of Ekiti State; the South South, but people in the South East have not taken to the streets.

Many of those interviewed in the course of the protest in some states of the North like Katsina, Zamfara and Sokoto, said though they are farmers, they have been reduced to beggars because they no longer have access to their farmlands due to banditry and kidnappings. 

 

You can’t serve bullets where bread is pleaded – Soyinka

In his reaction to Tinubu’s broadcast on the protest, Soyinka, in a statement yesterday, expressed concern over the president’s omission of the shooting and killing of protesters who are demanding for good governance.

He said the state cannot serve bullets where bread is pleaded.

The Nigerian playwright condemned the use of live bullets and teargas by security agents to manage civic protests, saying that such actions would lead to violence.

He said: “His (Tinubu) outline of the government’s remedial action since inception, aimed at warding off just such an outbreak, will undoubtedly receive expert and sustained attention both for effectiveness and in content analysis.

“My primary concern, quite predictably, is the continuing deterioration of the state’s seizure of protest management, an area in which the presidential address fell conspicuously short.

“Such short-changing of civic deserving, regrettably, goes to arm the security forces in the exercise of impunity and condemns the nation to a seemingly unbreakable cycle of resentment and reprisals.

“Live bullets as state response to civic protest – that becomes the core issue. Even teargas remains questionable in most circumstances, certainly an abuse in situations of clearly peaceful protest. Hunger marches constitute a universal S.O.S, not peculiar to the Nigerian nation. They belong indeed in a class of their own, never mind the collateral claims emblazoned on posters.

“They serve as summons to governance that a breaking point has been reached and thus, a testing ground for governance awareness of public desperation. The tragic response to the ongoing hunger marches in parts of the nation, and for which notice was served, constitutes a retrogression that takes the nation even further back than the deadly culmination of the watershed EndSARS protests.”

 

President’s speech hollow – Atiku

On his part, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar described Tinubu’s speech as hollow because it failed to address the demands of protesters on pressing economic hardship.

In a statement issued by his media adviser, Paul Ibe, Atiku said: “President Bola Tinubu’s broadcast this morning, intended to quell the fervour of public protests against his administration’s poor governance, utterly misses the mark.

“His speech neglects the pressing economic hardships that have besieged Nigerian families since the very beginning of his tenure.

“This address lacks credibility and fails to offer any immediate, tangible solutions to the Nigerian people. Given the extensive publicity surrounding the protests and the threats issued by government officials against demonstrators, one would have expected President Tinubu to present ground-breaking reforms, particularly those aimed at reducing the exorbitant costs of governance.

“But alas, no such announcements were made. The president ignored the protesters’ demands, such as suspending the purchase of aircraft for the president, downsizing his bloated cabinet, or even eliminating the costly and burdensome office of the First Lady, who has been indulging in extravagant trips at the nation’s expense.

“In his lacklustre recorded speech, President Tinubu offered a superficial account of his so-called reforms, revealing his own tenuous grasp of policy as he failed to convince his audience. While the president has spoken, it is unfortunate that his words lack substance and respect for the protesters’ sentiments, leaving Nigerians with little faith in his reform agenda – if one exists at all.

 “We urge the president and his team to own up to their failures over the past 14 months and abandon the absurd theory that the protests are orchestrated by the opposition. This administration has failed on all fronts, even in the simple task of keeping a presidential speech confidential.”

 

Tinubu did not address protesters’ demands – Falana

On his part, Falana, SAN, called on Tinubu to address the demands of the protesters.

In a statement issued yesterday, he said: “If the government takes the fight against corruption to oil dealers and crude oil is processed in government-owned refineries, there will be no basis for fuel subsidy, which is induced by the importation of petroleum products.

“A positive response to the key demands of the youths could make them review their actions. Insensitivity to their demands can only provoke continued action,” he said. Falana also applauded the protesters for forcing politicians to listen, who he said “are eating in Abuja to the plight of millions of Nigerians who are hungry.”

He also called for the “immediate and unconditional release of all protesters that were arrested and detained,” saying they had not committed any criminal offence.

Falana also condemned the repression of the peaceful protesters. “We commiserate with the families of the patriots’ peaceful protesters that were killed and call on the federal and state governments to set up commissions of inquiry, which should include representatives of credible human rights organisations and the NBA to investigate the killings with a view to bringing to justice the reckless murderers in police uniform and ensuring that.

 “The family members of the deceased should be adequately compensated by the federal government. The victims of the barbarous police killings should be identified and celebrated as heroes and heroines of the struggle for the emancipation of the downtrodden Nigerian people. Participation in peaceful protests should never be criminalised in Nigeria,” he said.  

 

Address security crisis in the North – Northern elders

While giving its assessment on the president’s speech, the Northern Elders Forum (NEF) said it was “gravely concerned” over Tinubu’s failure to mention the severe security situation plaguing the North West and other parts of the northern region in his speech.

The NEF, in a statement by Abdul-Azeez Suleiman, Director of Publicity and Advocacy of the group, drew attention to the escalating issues of banditry, kidnapping, rape, and various other criminal activities devastating the region, which have subjected the population to pervasive fear and insecurity.

It pointed out that the policing of communities in northern Nigeria has become a critical challenge.

The group said: “Criminal elements continue to wreak havoc, causing immense suffering for the residents of these regions. As a result, many communities have been forced to abandon their farmlands, schools have been shut down, and livelihoods destroyed.

“NEF is gravely concerned that the president’s recent speech failed to address these urgent issues or provide reassurance to the communities living in constant fear and uncertainty.

“Despite choosing not to comment on the ongoing protests in the country—remaining committed to peace and national stability—the forum had hoped for the president’s acknowledgment of the North West’s struggles and other affected regions. 

They anticipated words of encouragement and an assurance of concrete steps being taken to alleviate the security challenges faced by these communities.

“The NEF had high hopes for the president’s speech, expecting that he would address the dire humanitarian disaster that criminal activities have brought upon our nation. The scale of the crisis is immense, with millions of our fellow citizens displaced internally, and hundreds of thousands of orphans facing hunger and malnourishment. These are new and alarming realities that were previously unknown in our land.

“It is essential that the magnitude of this challenge is not underestimated. Dealing with this humanitarian disaster in the North will require a level of political will and administrative competence that goes beyond what is needed to defeat criminal gangs.

“The simultaneous challenges of combating insurgency and banditry, rehabilitating IDPs, and rebuilding lives, communities, and infrastructure must all be top priorities for the government.

“We expected the president to acknowledge the gravity of the situation and outline concrete plans for addressing these critical issues. The focus should have been on finding sustainable solutions to the crisis, prioritising the needs of the affected communities, and ensuring that necessary resources are allocated to support them,” NEF said.

 

He is sticking to anti-masses policy – Afenifere

The pan-Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, also said the president has not addressed the real issues of the protest. Prince Justice Faloye, National Publicity Secretary of Afenifere loyal to the Ag. Leader Chief Ayo Adebanjo, while talking with our correspondent said it was unfortunate that the president is sticking to anti-masses policy of retaining subsidy.

According to him, the president’s speech has not addressed the problem of hunger in the land.

He said, “We never believed that just calling for dialogue would change anything. He has never changed. His neo-liberal economy is the problem – the removal of fuel subsidy and the floating of the naira and he’s bent on continuing it and he does not feel any remorse on how he wants to change but really I don’t think he will change.

“It is unfortunate because we have seen so many countries where these neo-liberal economic policies have not worked. 

“I think he was pushed to read the speech because it was not a matter of dialogue or him addressing people about the exact policy that brought hunger and since he is not willing to reverse or accept responsibility, because he more or less said it was politically motivated.

“When he started and he said specifically that subsidy is dead, he said you can protest as much as you like. He said that. He knew that his policies were going to bring protest. At his age he knows that there have been all sorts of protests against subsidy removal.”

The Afenifere spokesman stated that it was disingenuous for the president to tag the protest politically motivated when he also called for protest under the administration of Goodluck Jonathan.

“It is the same thing that happened under former President Goodluck Jonathan and he (Tinubu) called for a revolution or protest and when he is facing the same thing and even worse, he is blaming other people.”

Also speaking, another chieftain of Afenifere and former Deputy Governor of Lagos State, Chief Kofoworola Bucknor Akerele, said she was disappointed in the speech.

She said the speech had not addressed the issues of the protest, especially insecurity which has made it difficult for farmers to go to their farms and make food available in abundance.