Court issues fresh order for Lagos to vacate Probeni’s seaside property 

Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court in Lagos has issued fresh orders, restraining the Lagos State Attorney-General and the Lagos State Special Task Force from interfering with the property located at B20, Wole Olateju Crescent, Lekki, pending the resolution of a legal dispute. The court issued the order after Abiodun A. Olatunji (SAN), […]

Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court in Lagos has issued fresh orders, restraining the Lagos State Attorney-General and the Lagos State Special Task Force from interfering with the property located at B20, Wole Olateju Crescent, Lekki, pending the resolution of a legal dispute.

The court issued the order after Abiodun A. Olatunji (SAN), counsel for the applicant, moved the motion.

It reaffirmed that the interlocutory order made on October 18, 2021, and the vacation order issued on November 5, 2021, remain in effect and have not been overturned by any higher court.

The court issued the following orders:

Restraining Order: The court ordered the Lagos State Attorney-General (1st defendant) and the Lagos State Special Task Force (3rd defendant), along with their agents, employees, or anyone acting on their behalf, to cease all efforts to demolish, evict, or forcibly remove assets, property, or equipment from the plaintiffs’ property at B20, Wole Olateju Crescent, Off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Eti-Osa Local Government Area, Lagos State, until the substantive suit is resolved.

Cease Intimidation and Harassment: The court also ordered the 1st and 3rd defendants to stop all forms of intimidation, harassment, or arrest of the plaintiffs’ staff, as well as any forceful removal of equipment, boats, or other items. The defendants were also instructed to halt any illegal construction or unauthorized allocation of the property to third parties.

Restoration of Property: The court directed the 1st and 3rd defendants to immediately return any property, equipment, boats, or other items unlawfully removed from the plaintiffs’ land. These items should be restored to their original condition, as they were before the unlawful actions taken by the defendants and their agents.

An affidavit sworn by Olatubosun Kajogbola, a Senior Litigation Officer at Abdullahi Ibrahim & Co. (representing the plaintiffs), explained that the court had previously granted an interlocutory injunction on October 18, 2021, preventing the Lagos State Attorney-General and the Lagos State Special Task Force from entering or interfering with the plaintiffs’ property at the disputed site.

However, on September 16, 2024, the 1st and 3rd defendants served a contravention notice to the plaintiffs, alleging illegal occupation of government land and unauthorized development.

The notice threatened to demolish the plaintiffs’ property unless they addressed the alleged contravention within two days.

The plaintiffs argue that they are suffering irreparable harm due to these actions, with no monetary compensation sufficient to address the damage caused by the defendants’ unlawful and contemptuous behavior.

The legal dispute dates back to 2008, when Admiral Porbeni applied to the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) for approval to construct a jetty and boat club on the site. NIWA granted the application, but tension escalated when, on September 30, 2021, officials from the Lagos State Task Force entered the premises without notice or a court order, marking equipment and structures for removal within 48 hours.

As a result of these actions, Admiralty Fleet Limited and Admiral Porbeni are seeking a court declaration that the Lagos State Task Force’s actions constitute trespass and violate their constitutional right to own property, as guaranteed under Section 43 of Nigeria’s Constitution.

In its reaction, the Good Governance Alliance Nigeria (GGA-N) stated: “The case raises significant concerns about the erosion of the rule of law in Lagos State and the continued overreach of state agencies in defiance of federal legal protections and court orders, despite a Supreme Court ruling that affirmed the Federal Government’s exclusive authority over Nigeria’s inland waterways.”