FAAC Inflows Critical to Subnational Governance, Economic Growth in Nigeria – Experts

As Nigerian states continue to rely heavily on monthly federal allocations to fund governance and development projects, economic experts have stressed that prudent management of Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) inflows remains critical to improving infrastructure, healthcare, education and economic growth across the country. For many states, particularly those with weak Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), […]

As Nigerian states continue to rely heavily on monthly federal allocations to fund governance and development projects, economic experts have stressed that prudent management of Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) inflows remains critical to improving infrastructure, healthcare, education and economic growth across the country.

For many states, particularly those with weak Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), FAAC allocations remain the primary source of funding for recurrent and capital expenditure. The monthly disbursements enable state governments to pay salaries, meet pension obligations, service debts, execute infrastructure projects and provide essential public services.

Economic expert, Mr. Yusha’u Aliyu, said FAAC disbursements remain one of the most significant drivers of governance and development at the subnational level, noting that effective utilisation of the funds could help address critical challenges facing states.

According to him, investments in education, healthcare, infrastructure and human capital development remain crucial for achieving sustainable growth.

• Hajj: Pilgrims Warned Against Excess Luggage
• Charcoal, firewood business booms as Abuja residents groan over Rising gas prices

“The funds can make a significant difference when they are properly utilised. For development to take place, governments need to invest in people and their basic needs. There must be modern learning environments, functional healthcare centres, good road networks and markets that attract investors,” he said.

The primary objective of FAAC allocations is to ensure the equitable distribution of federally collected revenues among the three tiers of government. Under Nigeria’s revenue-sharing arrangement, the Federal Government receives 52.68 per cent of distributable revenue, states receive 26.72 per cent, while local governments receive 20.60 per cent. Oil-producing states also receive an additional 13 per cent derivation allocation.

An analysis of FAAC allocation data recently released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reveals significant disparities in allocations across states, largely driven by factors such as population, equality of states, derivation revenue, land mass and other components of the revenue-sharing formula.

Population remains a major factor in Nigeria’s horizontal revenue allocation formula, influencing how much each state and local government receives from the distributable pool. In addition, oil-producing states benefit from the 13 per cent derivation fund designed to compensate for the environmental and infrastructural impacts of crude oil production.

The data showed that a total of N14.55 trillion was shared among the 36 states and Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Lagos State received the highest allocation at ₦144.38 billion, followed by Delta State with ₦96.26 billion, Rivers State with ₦88.87 billion, Bayelsa State with ₦79.24 billion and Akwa Ibom State with ₦73.87 billion.

The strong performance of oil-producing states reflects the impact of derivation revenue, while Lagos continues to benefit from its large population, economic significance and strategic position within the national economy.

Among the states receiving moderate allocations were Kano with ₦48.45 billion, Oyo with ₦47.81 billion, Jigawa with ₦36.17 billion, Ondo with ₦35.19 billion and Anambra with ₦34.32 billion.

Others include Katsina with ₦33.39 billion, Borno with ₦33.31 billion, Imo with ₦32.17 billion, Benue with ₦32.10 billion, Sokoto with ₦31.46 billion, Adamawa with ₦31.44 billion, Abia with ₦31.22 billion, Kebbi with ₦31.21 billion and Edo with ₦31.02 billion.

Niger received ₦30.40 billion, Zamfara ₦29.96 billion, Enugu ₦29.95 billion and Kogi ₦29.52 billion.

Further down the list were Yobe with ₦28.29 billion, Nasarawa with ₦28.28 billion, Taraba with ₦28.11 billion, Plateau with ₦27.91 billion and Kwara with ₦27.85 billion. Osun received ₦26.36 billion, Ebonyi ₦26.26 billion and Bauchi ₦26.18 billion.

Among the states with the lowest allocations were the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which received ₦25.13 billion, Gombe with ₦24.74 billion, Kaduna with ₦24.54 billion, Ekiti with ₦23.81 billion and Ogun with ₦23.35 billion.

Cross River recorded the lowest allocation at ₦22.50 billion.

While FAAC allocations remain a financial lifeline for many states, experts argue that the real challenge lies in converting the funds into measurable development outcomes.

Aliyu noted that governments must adopt short-, medium- and long-term development strategies that ensure sustainability and improve citizens’ quality of life.

“Government needs to set short-term, medium-term and long-term strategies for sustainability. There should be functioning healthcare centres, improved schools, markets and road infrastructure that can support economic activities and attract investments,” he said.

Financial analyst, Busola Olukoye, observed that many states continue to devote a significant portion of FAAC receipts to salaries and overhead costs.

While acknowledging the importance of meeting payroll obligations, she argued that greater developmental impact could be achieved if more resources were directed towards capital projects and productive investments.

“FAAC allocations can become a powerful driver of development at the state level, but only when they are treated as strategic investment capital rather than monthly funds,” she said.

According to her, states that prioritise infrastructure development, human capital investment, transparency and productivity tend to record stronger economic outcomes than those that remain dependent on recurrent spending.

“What separates states that make visible progress from those that remain stagnant is not necessarily the size of their allocation, but how deliberately and structurally those funds are deployed,” she added.

Despite receiving substantial allocations over the years, many states continue to face challenges of poor infrastructure, inadequate healthcare services, weak educational outcomes, unemployment and high poverty levels.

The situation has continued to raise concerns among policy analysts and civil society groups about the efficiency, transparency and accountability of public spending at the subnational level.

Both experts argue that while FAAC allocations remain indispensable for state finances, sustainable economic growth and improved living standards will ultimately depend on how effectively state governments transform monthly inflows into tangible improvements in infrastructure, public services, job creation and economic productivity