How Mutfwang’s ‘defection’ could reshape Plateau’s politics
The reported defection of Plateau State Governor Caleb Mutfwang from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) has altered the state’s political equation, reopening old rivalries, unsettling party structures and raising fresh questions about leadership control ahead of 2027. Thought the governor is yet to make anh formal announcement, the […]
Governor Mutfwang
The reported defection of Plateau State Governor Caleb Mutfwang from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) has altered the state’s political equation, reopening old rivalries, unsettling party structures and raising fresh questions about leadership control ahead of 2027.
Thought the governor is yet to make anh formal announcement, the APC announced his defection on Thursday at its 14th National Caucus meeting held at the State House Conference Centre, Abuja, in the presence of President Bola Tinubu and six governors who had earlier defected from the PDP. Making the announcement, APC National Chairman Nentawe Yilwatda said the party now controls all states in the North Central zone.
Beyond the symbolism of APC’s regional dominance, Mutfwang’s move has reignited deep-seated tensions within Plateau politics, particularly within the APC, which only months earlier publicly rejected the governor’s entry.
Intrigues before the defection
Speculation about Mutfwang’s possible defection had trailed his administration for months, fuelled by persistent rumours, political permutations and open confrontation between the governor and the APC in Plateau. On several occasions, Mutfwang publicly dismissed claims that he was planning to defect, insisting he remained loyal to the PDP.
- Tinubu’s 2nd term, others for debate as APC fixes March for convention
- Solar panel importation drops to N92bn in Q3
In October, the Plateau APC appeared to shut the door firmly against him. At a stakeholders’ meeting in Jos attended by senior party figures, including Yilwatda and former governor Simon Lalong, who now represents Plateau South in the Senate, the party overwhelmingly voted against accepting Mutfwang.
Former APC Deputy National Secretary Festus Fuanter put the matter to a voice vote, asking whether members would accept the governor into the party. The response was a resounding “no”.
Mutfwang responded swiftly, acknowledging that pressure had been mounted on him to defect but insisting that only “two authorities” could sanction such a move: “the God of heaven and the people”, whom he identified as the PDP.
The APC, however, accused the governor of being evasive. The state’s acting APC Publicity Secretary, Shittu Bamaiyi, said Mutfwang was “living in self-denial”, arguing that if the governor’s performance had met public expectations, talk of defection would not have arisen.
“When the governor alleged that pressure was being mounted on him to join the APC, it became clear he was either being economical with the truth or his supporters were trying to pre-empt events,” Bamaiyi said, adding that Mutfwang failed to name those allegedly pressuring him.
Divisions within Plateau APC
Despite the October rejection, the question of Mutfwang’s defection continued to divide the APC in Plateau. In November, the party’s women wing staged a protest against alleged moves to woo the governor.
Led by Elizabeth Samson Yerse, who also coordinates the Tinubu Torch Bearers, the women warned party leaders against courting Mutfwang, recalling his past criticism of the APC.
“It is on record that the governor said he would never join the APC. He even called the APC an evil political party,” Yerse said. “We in the APC, especially the women wing, do not want Governor Caleb Mutfwang to join our party.”
A rival faction, the Concerned Plateau APC Legacy Members, took the opposite view, arguing that blocking the governor’s entry was against the party’s strategic interest. The group, which described itself as comprising pioneer APC members, accused the protest sponsors of political miscalculation.
Its convener, Emmanuel Dankasa, argued that the goodwill President Tinubu enjoys in Plateau does not automatically translate into electoral victory for the APC.
“Those sponsoring protests are under the false belief that APC can win Plateau in 2027 without Governor Mutfwang,” Dankasa said. He noted that a sitting governor controls party structures from ward to state level, as well as the loyalty of appointees and beneficiaries of government patronage.
Similarly, North Central APC Forum Chairman Saleh Zazzaga openly championed Mutfwang’s defection, urging the governor to ignore internal opposition. Zazzaga said those resisting the move lacked political foresight and were afraid of losing influence should Mutfwang assume leadership of the party in the state.
Plateau’s political history
To understand the weight of Mutfwang’s defection, analysts point to Plateau’s political history. Since the return to democracy in 1999, the state was largely a PDP stronghold. The party’s early dominance was reinforced by the influence of the late Solomon Lar, Plateau-born pioneer national chairman of the PDP, which secured the state considerable national leverage.
From 1999 to 2015, PDP produced the two governors, Joshua Dariye and Jonah Jang, who served two terms each. The party’s grip was broken in 2015 following internal disputes over zoning. Jang, then PDP leader in the state, was accused of sidelining the agreed rotation that favoured the southern zone, instead backing G.N.S. Pwakok, his kinsman, a move that triggered widespread protest voting.
Capitalising on the backlash, the APC’s Simon Lalong won the governorship. His victory was also aided by the APC’s emergence as a new national platform following its formation in 2013, which attracted aggrieved PDP members, including Lalong himself.
Lalong governed for eight years, but in 2023 the PDP reclaimed power when Mutfwang defeated APC candidate Nentawe Yilwatda. Many Plateau voters still view the PDP as more organically rooted in the state, a perception that partly explains Mutfwang’s earlier insistence that Plateau remained “PDP territory”.
Cold war and leadership contest
Since Mutfwang assumed office, relations between him and key APC figures, particularly Lalong and Yilwatda, have been tense. Both sides have traded public criticism, deepening a political cold war that shaped resistance to his defection.
Political observers believe the earlier rejection of Mutfwang by APC stakeholders was driven less by ideology than by fear of displacement. As a sitting governor, Mutfwang would almost certainly emerge as APC leader in the state, potentially sidelining existing power brokers.
Dankasa echoed this view, saying those opposing the defection were “beneficiaries of the status quo” who feared becoming politically irrelevant. He urged them to prioritise party interest over personal advantage.
This underlying rivalry, analysts warn, could translate into intense internal contestation within the APC, particularly over control of structures and the 2027 governorship ticket.
Implications for APC and PDP
The immediate challenge for Mutfwang, according to Barrister Dogara Abubakar, former Plateau chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council and now SDP national vice chairman (North), is internal integration.
Abubakar said the governor must cultivate strong working relationships with existing APC leaders or risk marginalisation. “If not well managed, internal resistance could cost him the party’s ticket in 2027,” he warned.
For the PDP, the defection represents a significant blow. As governor, Mutfwang commands loyalty across government appointees and grassroots structures, many of whom are likely to follow him to the APC, weakening the party’s operational capacity.
However, Plateau PDP Publicity Secretary Felix Choji urged caution, saying the party had not yet received official communication on the defection. He maintained that the PDP retains strong organisational mechanisms at both state and national levels.
Similarly, Clinton Garuba, media aide to former governor Jonah Jang, said Jang would reserve comment until he heard directly from Mutfwang. He disclosed, however, that the governor had earlier hinted at the move and that Jang’s position would be made public in due course, stressing that his principal’s priority remained Plateau’s development.
While the governor on Thursday said he joined the APC in the overall interest of the state, revealing that President Tinubu personally invited him to decamp from the PDP to the ruling party, his Special Adviser on Inter-Party Relations, John Akans, defended the move in a Facebook post, describing it as being in the best interest of the state.
Akans framed the defection as a bridge-building exercise aimed at aligning Plateau with federal development priorities. He portrayed Mutfwang’s decision as one driven by unity, equity and progress, arguing that the governor was putting the people’s mandate above party considerations.
Reacting, APC Publicity Secretary Shittu Bamaiyi, who had been one of the critical voices against the defection, made a volte-face. He said the governor’s defection was welcome and dismissed claims that the party had opposed the move. He said earlier resistance came from individuals and groups acting independently, not the party as an institution.
Analyst warns of fierce 2027 contests, reconciliation challenges
Commenting on the defection and its implications for the 2027 elections and Plateau State’s broader political stability, Prof Adeyi Major of the Department of Political Science, University of Jos, said the situation was inherently complex, given the coming together of long-standing political rivals.
He noted that one of the most critical flashpoints would emerge during the nomination of candidates ahead of the next general election, warning that competition between entrenched APC figures and new entrants from the PDP would be intense.
“When you look at Plateau State, the battle lines between the APC and the PDP have existed for a long time. In fact, some members of these parties do not even speak to one another,” he said.
According to him, reconciling such deeply divided political actors would not be easy, although it remained possible if leaders subordinated personal interests to broader state interests.
Major also questioned whether the massive support once enjoyed by the PDP in Plateau could be sustained under the new political configuration.
“That depends on several factors, including federal presence and a comparative assessment of Governor Caleb Mutfwang’s performance in office,” he said, stressing that such decisions ultimately rested with voters.
He further emphasised the centrality of credible party primaries to democratic stability in the state, noting that unresolved questions over control of party structures could fuel further internal conflict.
Major observed that political realignments on the Plateau were not entirely new, noting that most APC leaders had roots in the PDP.
“We must remember that most politicians have short memories. About 90 per cent of those currently in the APC began their political careers in the PDP. Disagreements pushed them apart, but essentially, they all came from the same political family,” he said.
The key question, he argued, was whether reconciliation was possible. “They must think Plateau first. Whatever decisions are taken must be in the interest of Plateau State, not personal ambition. Plateau has experienced enough crises. Politics should not be used to generate new tensions.”
On the strategic rationale behind Mutfwang’s defection, Major said the governor may have acted to mitigate legal and political risks associated with the PDP’s internal crisis.
Ultimately, Mutfwang’s defection has reconfigured Plateau’s political terrain but also introduced new uncertainties. While it strengthens APC’s numerical dominance in the North Central, it exposes internal fault lines that could undermine cohesion. For the PDP, the loss the seventh incumbent governor in 2025 is another setback that will test its resilience and capacity to reorganise.
How Mutfwang navigates APC’s internal politics, manages old rivals and consolidates his authority may determine whether the defection becomes a masterstroke or a costly gamble ahead of the next electoral cycle.