Man rapes 63-year-old mother over money argument

A man from Cincinnati, Ohio has reportedly raped his 63-year-old mother and broke her neck over money argument. According to Hamilton County Common Pleas Court documents cited by The Cincinnati Enquirer he dragged her around the home, punching her in the face and body and forcibly raped her, which resulted to fractured vertebrae, bruises, cuts and bite marks to […]

Man rapes 63-year-old mother over money argument
Man rapes 63-year-old mother over money argument

A man from Cincinnati, Ohio has reportedly raped his 63-year-old mother and broke her neck over money argument.

According to Hamilton County Common Pleas Court documents cited by The Cincinnati Enquirer he dragged her around the home, punching her in the face and body and forcibly raped her, which resulted to fractured vertebrae, bruises, cuts and bite marks to her inner thighs and back.

An assistant prosecutor in the case revealed the mother tried to flee naked to a neighbour’s house, but her son dragged her back home before throwing her “back over the fence”.

She also revealed that the mother’s DNA was found on the defendant’s genitals.

The 46-year-old pleaded who initially revoked his plea deal at the last moment, later pleaded guilty to rape after having words with his lawyer.

 “I take my plea back,” he said. “I want to go to trial with this. It’s all bogus and lies.”

After words with his lawyer, who told the judge his client was “having a hard time wrapping his mind around” the sentence, the man changed his mind.

 In exchange for his plea of guilty to rape, criminal assault and kidnapping, the prosecutors dropped charges of attempted rape and abduction.

He however told the judge he could not remember the incident.

“This is a bad situation. I feel bad about the whole incident. But I don’t even know what happened. I blacked out, somebody slipped me something in my drink. I don’t even know what was going on. I just don’t know,” he said.

The prosecutor revealed that mother could not appear before the court because of her ‘affection for her son.’