NASS regulate your failures and excesses, not NGO’s
The National Assembly (NASS) isrenowned for being the least transparent and most financially secretive arm of government. In what ranks as one of the greatest ironies of our time, they believe that they can enforce transparency and accountability in operations of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO’s) and Civil Society Organisations (CSO’s)! A proposed Bill to establish a […]

The National Assembly (NASS) isrenowned
for being the least transparent and most
financially secretive arm of government.
In what ranks as one of the greatest ironies of
our time, they believe that they can enforce
transparency and accountability in operations
of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO’s)
and Civil Society Organisations (CSO’s)! A
proposed Bill to establish a NGO Regulatory
Commission has passed its second reading
in the House of Representatives. Seeking to
govern the activities of NGO’s and CSO’s the
Bill ranks alongside Obasanjo’s “third-term”
Constitutional amendments as the most
repugnant piece of legislation ever considered
under a democratic dispensation in Nigeria.
It’s not a question of accountability.
The Bill has all the trappings of a poorly
thought out piece of subterfuge. It appears to
be an underhand method of restricting the
actions of NGO’s and CSO’s which routinely
uncover political and financial corruption,
oppose lack of accountability in the NASS, and
expose the lavish lifestyles of elected officials.
The Bill’s sponsor Hon Umar Jibril exhibited
all the hubris and lack of respect for public
opinion associated with members of the
NASS when he dismissed negative reactions
to his proposed legislation as “shameful and
condemnable”. His outburst wasn’t surprising
because our legislators concern themselves
with silencing those who complain about
their ineffectiveness and lack of focus, and
defending their self-granted privileges, rather
than imbibing public opinion and enacting
laws to improve the lives of citizens.
Disgracefully at a time when the rest of
the world is talking about leaner, cheaper
and more efficient governance, our overpaid
and underworked Legislators are discussing
creating more organs of government. It’s
difficult not to agree with the view of the
Secretary of the Pentecostal Fellowship of
Nigeria, Bishop Isong that it’s frustrating
for government to be spending time on an
NGO Bill when they should be focusing
on addressing the economic and security
challenges in the country. The Bishop cynically
remarked that if legislators truly mean well,
then they should first regulate their bogus
allowances!
The biggest recurring criticism of the NASS
is that they have proved to be incapable
of conceptualising, let alone passing,
legislation which impacts positively on the
lives of Nigerians. In a nation that lacks basic
infrastructure; that borrows to finance its
budget; and in which government finds
it difficult to pay salaries, pensions and
gratuities, it beggars belief that anyone in their
right mind would propose more expensive
governance. The Nigerian Network of NGO’s
should be commended for kicking against this
idea of creating another Federal Agency which
will squander lean resources on Secretariats,
State Liaison Offices, Executive salaries and
fleets of SUV’s.
The claim that a Commission is required
because “some NGO’s collected funds for
North East IDP’s and disappeared” and
because “some NGO’s are used to fund the
activities of terrorists”, is untenable. There
are existing laws which cover such criminal
behaviour and can be used to bring those
responsible to book. Hon Femi Gbajabiamila’s
declaration that NGO’s are somehow above
the law and must be regulated by government
is erroneous. Many nations cope without NGO
regulation commissions.
Furthermore, as it stands there is already
regulation. Firstly, because all NGO’s
are registered with the Corporate Affairs
Commission (CAC). Secondly, because foreign
donors don’t just give money away, they do
their own form of vetting before they assist
NGO’s. The fear that the proposed Bill was
conjured up to stifle the activities of civil society
groups who are important actors in expanding
citizen’s rights and the democratic space in
Nigeria is very real. The powers the Bill seeks
to confer upon the Commission represent a
slide into a police state which will encourage
tyrannical tendencies in governance, supress
freedom of speech, and negatively impact
upon humanitarian organizations who quite
absurdly would have to apply for permission
before embarking upon any projects.
Worse still there are many who believe
that the Bill is intended to bring religion
under State control because Churches can
be categorized as CSO’s or NGO’s since they
carry out charitable services. Coming hot
on the heels of recent attempts to enact laws
regulating the tenure of Church Pastors and
General Overseers, to license all preachers,
and to muzzle the social media, it comes as no
surprise that the proposed Bill is viewed with
distain as being belligerent, self-righteous,
dictatorial and autocratic.
The proposed NGO Regulatory
Commission whose members would be
appointed by the President, would be saddled
with the responsibility of issuing licenses
which are renewable every two years. Many
Legal experts are of the opinion that this is
illegal because NGO’s are registered with
the CAC and have acquired the status of
perpetual succession and corporate legal
personality, which cannot be stripped from
them. This quite ridiculous license renewal
provision means that NGO’s should not
carry out projects that are of more than two
years’ duration! These restrictions have been
condemned by the Prelate of the Methodist
Church of Nigeria, the Chief Imam of Ansarud-
Deen, and so many other pastors and
clerics as being inimical to the interests of
both NGO’s and the nation. They believe that
the less government is involved in regulating
the affairs of NGO’s the better.
Indeed, the best way of ensuring that
corruption and substandard performance
is rife in NGO’s is to involve government
regulation! In all truthfulness, government
officials have shown little ability to regulate
themselves or anything else. Despite the NASS
well publicised oversight functions few if any
regulatory agencies are functioning effectively.
Our markets are flooded with fake drugs
and other products; smuggling continues
unabated through our notoriously porous
borders, treasury looting and contract inflation
is still rampant; and the nation is littered with
substandard diagnostic laboratories, hospitals,
roads and schools. The NASS would be well
advised to first regulate their own excesses,
then regulate our failed regulatory agencies
before attempting to regulate NGO’s.